<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter or Yammer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stevienova.com/2009/03/29/twitter-or-yammer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stevienova.com/2009/03/29/twitter-or-yammer/</link>
	<description>Homepage of Steve Novoselac</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:59:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevienova.com/2009/03/29/twitter-or-yammer/comment-page-1/#comment-150454</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 15:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stevienova.com/?p=1115#comment-150454</guid>
		<description>Listened to a podcast about Yammer: http://web20show.com/episodes/episode-53-yammer

Interesting set up. I can see how it can better control internal correspondence for businesses. Had it come before email it could have been an industry standard. What I don&#039;t understand is why corporate actually accepts email, more loose, more liability, to something like Yammer. 

Fyi, they&#039;re going to make a version that can be set behind a corporate firewall to appease the corporate masses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Listened to a podcast about Yammer: <a href="http://web20show.com/episodes/episode-53-yammer" rel="nofollow">http://web20show.com/episodes/episode-53-yammer</a></p>
<p>Interesting set up. I can see how it can better control internal correspondence for businesses. Had it come before email it could have been an industry standard. What I don&#8217;t understand is why corporate actually accepts email, more loose, more liability, to something like Yammer. </p>
<p>Fyi, they&#8217;re going to make a version that can be set behind a corporate firewall to appease the corporate masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dukebaby</title>
		<link>http://blog.stevienova.com/2009/03/29/twitter-or-yammer/comment-page-1/#comment-149416</link>
		<dc:creator>Dukebaby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stevienova.com/?p=1115#comment-149416</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been looking into Yammer a bit.  I like the idea of it and can see how it is beneficial.  

I don&#039;t like the new trend of Twitter going mainstream.  It used to be just colleagues and other techies I found interesting like you say.  It seems like it is turning into facebook.  I don&#039;t need Twitter to turn into a place where I hear, &quot;I am going for a walk.&quot;  Keep that at Facebook.  Twitter is a place to hear about what is going on in the industry and tips.  

I too keep the segregation between twitter and facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking into Yammer a bit.  I like the idea of it and can see how it is beneficial.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the new trend of Twitter going mainstream.  It used to be just colleagues and other techies I found interesting like you say.  It seems like it is turning into facebook.  I don&#8217;t need Twitter to turn into a place where I hear, &#8220;I am going for a walk.&#8221;  Keep that at Facebook.  Twitter is a place to hear about what is going on in the industry and tips.  </p>
<p>I too keep the segregation between twitter and facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
